Cerebral Palsy Technological News

Using Hyperbaric Oxygen Therapy to treat Brain Injuries

By Ken G. Knott, M.D. And Christopher Grant, CHT

A person can survive a few days without water, and weeks without
food, but if the body is deprived of oxygen, biological death begins
to occur within three minutes. The same goes if you deprive just
an area of the body of oxygen, such as the brain.
When brain tissue has been damaged due to an injury, a lack of blood flow or a lack of oxygen, the cells that surround the injured area, called the penumbra, may only be receiving a fraction of the blood flow and oxygen they need for optimum health. This disruption creates impairment of cell function. The cells become dormant and may remain permanently impaired.
Hyperbaric Oxygen Therapy (HBOT) for brain injuries is based on the theory that even if brain tissue has been injured, the dormant cells surrounding the injured area can be revived. To do this, the blood supply to the dormant cells needs to be improved.
A hyperbaric oxygen chamber, in which a patient lies, is pressurized with 100 percent oxygen to greater than atmospheric pressure. While at a typical treatment pressure of 1.5 atmospheres absolute (ATA) (equal to 7.5 psig or 16.88 feet of sea water) the patient would be breathing an equivalent of 150 percent oxygen or oneand- a-half-times more oxygen molecules in each breath. This will allow the plasma to carry 10 to 15 percent more dissolved oxygen throughout the entire body including areas with decreased blood flow. This is the first step in “flipping on the switch.” When given daily, HBOT stimulates a process called angiogenesis or the formation of new blood vessels. These new blood vessels form slowly in the vicinity of the damaged tissues, providing more blood flow and oxygen to the dormant cells. This revives the dormant cells and allows them to resume their normal function. With many brain injuries, edema and hyper-perfusion can be present even for year’s later. In the initial stages, HBOT can reduce this state by vasoconstriction, which decreases blood fl ow to these areas which in turn allows them to normalize. Simultaneously, an increased percentage of oxygen is being delivered to the tissues. The result of angiogenesis and vasoconstriction is a permanent structural change in blood supply to the damaged brain tissue and an important contribution to the degree of recovery from the brain injury. We have seen brain injured patients experience various results as early as the first treatment and even more after 20 treatments. Some patients don’t see anything significant until a few weeks after their fortieth treatment. So, how many treatments should we initially do? Is some better than none? Well some is better than none and it all depends on the individual case. If a patient is treated early, within 48 hours, one can sometimes evoke a greater response with a lesser number of treatments. However, as the result of many case studies, we know that non-acute patients who have completed an initial set of 40 consecutive HBOT treatments can make positive changes in which the majority, if not all, become permanent.
The reason involves basic physiology. With the increased oxygen in the plasma, the dormant brain cells “turn on” or “awaken” from their dormant state. As function returns, we see clinical changes in the patient. The reason the cells are dormant is due to a lack of blood flow and a corresponding lack of oxygen. So, if the plasma is the only thing delivering the oxygen, and you stop HBOT, then you stop giving those cells the oxygen they need to remain functioning and they become dormant again. Many times theses patients do not regress completely but they do lose some of what they may have gained. If a patient completes the full 40 treatments, regression is typically absent and more gains continue for weeks and months after their fourtieth.
It has been shown that capillary budding (growth of blood vessels) can begin as soon as the 8th treatment. The capillary further develops by 20th treatment but it is not completely stable. By 30th to 35th treatment the capillary becomes increasingly stable and by the 40th treatment the new capillary is essentially permanent. This has been proven time and again with non-healing wounds and the salvage of grafts and flaps. HBOT has been stopped prematurely in patients who were showing signs of healing of wounds, grafts or flaps. A few days later, the wound began to deteriorate and the wound, graft or flap fails. Although the histology of the capillaries is different when comparing brain capillaries to those found in other areas of the body, a capillary basically grows the same in the foot as it does in the brain. Physiology is physiology.
Case Study I
Six year old female -
Patient with failure to thrive and resultant cerebral palsy began her
first set of hyperbaric treatments in September 2001.
Protocol: 11-HBOT session at 1.6ATA for 90-minutes and 3-HBOT
sessions at 1.6ATA for 60 minutes (Equivalent of 20.5 one-hour
treatments).
Gains: less moody, calmer, attempted to do puzzles, was able to touch
nose, ear, etc. on command.
Regression: less interest in puzzles, more excitable, less awareness. In July 2002 the patient completed an additional 20 HBOT sessions. Protocol: 20-HBOT sessions at 1.6ATA for 60 minutes. Gains: able to complete 20-piece puzzle, attempted to open/close car door, improved school performance, less disruptive, less seizures, improved ability to follow directions, walked with assistance. Regression: gradual loss of ambulatory skills, more disruptive, less attentiveness to directions or commands, limited interest in puzzles. In November 2003 she started 40 consecutive HBOT at a new
hyperbaric center.
Protocol: 40-HBOT sessions at 1.5ATA for 60 minutes. Gains: more appropriate response to commands, improved speech pattern (pronunciation), signifi cant behavior change (improved by “70 percent” according to mother), seizure activity diminished, independent play activities improved, speaking in phrases, walking with minimal or no assistance, routine eye contact and virtual completion of toilet training.
No regression.
Upon follow-up of patient 2 months post Gains - integrated into more advanced educational environment, more improvement in speech pattern, a continued ability to engage in play, and a continued ability to ambulate with minimal or no assistance.
No regression.
Upon follow-up of patient 6 months post-HBOT no regression.
Initial SPECT scan - October 2003.
Post HBO SPECT scan - January 2004.
SPECT scan difference of Brain Blood Flow (BBF) between
pre-HBOT of 40 treatments and post-HBOT: 45 percent global
increase of BBF
Impression and Comments: In retrospect, the patient appeared to benefit from the initial HBOT treatment regimen, but regression was noted. The second 20 HBOT treatment regimen also showed a positive response, however regression was again noted. When the patient was given a 40 HBOT treatment regimen, there did not appear to be any regression in any area. There are certainly no guarantees, however, based upon the results seen with this patient, but it does appear that permanent changes are more likely to occur with an isolated 40 treatment program as opposed to an isolated 20 treatment program.
Case Study II:
2-day old male -
Protocol: 5-HBOT sessions at 1.2 ATA for 60 minutes. After a full term, normal pregnancy, mother experienced a difficult vaginal delivery of a 10 pound -10 ounce boy. The infant’s left shoulder became lodged during delivery and the doctor worked for more than four minutes to dislodge the infant’s shoulder. Once delivered, the infant cried weakly and went into shock. The respiratory department was called stat and worked on the infant for more than three minutes. He subsequently began crying and fully stabilized after 20 minutes. After examination by two different pediatricians, both stated the baby was fine, but no prognosis was offered. The infant was released at 32 hours of age and began hyperbaric oxygen treatment at 40 hours of age.
During the first treatment while in the HBOT chamber, the infant became visibly more alert. After removal from the chamber, the infant exhibited a much stronger vocal response as well as cooing and was much more animated. No additional changes were noted during the next four treatments.
Upon follow-up, the patient reached 95 percent level of growth and development and started walking at 10 months of age. In addition the mother’s back pain resulting from the epidural injection decreased by 80 percent after first treatment and was gone after the second treatment.
Impression and comments: This particular case study is an example of using HBOT in an acute setting to reduce potential neurological problems resulting from oxygen deprivation. It also illustrates the safety of the use of HBOT in young children. Due to the extreme low age of the infant, a pressure of 1.2 ATA was utilized even though 1.5 ATA would have most likely been well tolerated and indicated.
Conclusion:
Unfortunately, HBOT treatment for neurological conditions is not paid for by insurance companies. However, payment policies by insurance companies do not necessarily follow what is medically indicated. The two foregoing case studies illustrate a typical response by patients given the appropriate treatment regimen with HBOT. All patients are different and as a result, no two patients respond equally. However, the vast majority of brain injured patients, particularly those with damage due to reduced amount or lack of oxygen, responds very well to HBOT given at 1.5 ATA for 40 one-hour treatments on either a daily or twice daily basis.
Of course, the question may arise as to whether or not a lesser number of treatments would suffice. It’s easy to pick a number, but in our experience, we now know that we are seeing significantly less regression with the 40 treatment regimen as opposed to a 20 treatment program. In addition, we have seen further improvement in many patients who have undergone more HBOT after a break from their initial set of 40 treatments, but 40 seems to be the minimum starting point for non-acute patients. Remember, physiology is physiology.

Source: Cerebral Palsy Magazine Decamber 05

Read More - Cerebral Palsy Technological News

As MD's and lawyers we can determine that your child's Cerebral Palsy or Birth Injury is a result of Medical malpractice *Name: Address: City: State: AL AK AZ AR CA CO CT DE DC FL GA HI ID IL IN IA KS KY LA ME MD MA MI MN MS MO MT NE NV NH NJ NM NY NC ND OH OK OR PA RI SC SD TN TX UT VT VA WA WV WI WY *Email: *Phone Number: *Child’s age Child's Story: 1-866-452-9362 Phone or email now and one of our staff will contact you within 24 hours.

Our Cerebral Palsy lawyers, with degrees in both Law and Medicine, are on call to offer guidance on what steps you can take next in the direction that's best for your Cerebral Palsy child and for your family.
disclaimer